3.4.0
Re: 3.4.0
yeah, now it's monday already even in Baker Island!
https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/usa/baker-island
https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/usa/baker-island
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 2444
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 1:17 pm
Re: 3.4.0
The beta is posted about an hour ago.
I would have posted yesterday, but I discovered that the 32bit version was crashing on Windows XP. One thing led to another, it was after midnight, the next morning was working time.
I had figured that libtorrent 1.1.x was at fault, but no time to do proper installers+uploading till one hour ago.
I would have posted yesterday, but I discovered that the 32bit version was crashing on Windows XP. One thing led to another, it was after midnight, the next morning was working time.
I had figured that libtorrent 1.1.x was at fault, but no time to do proper installers+uploading till one hour ago.
Re: 3.4.0
I noticed that downloading a Big torrent (35GB) the 3.4 uses more then 600MB of RAM while uTorrent 2.2.1 (I guess you hate hearing that name) uses around 45MB. The difference is huge and that's with only one torrent added. On other machine I have a session with hundreds of them. I'm scared to even try upgrading it. On the other hand it seems to be quite stable. Not a single crash so far. It's also well translated which is always nice.
Re: 3.4.0
Hooray! \o/
First goodies I noticed were the Tags and the system file type specific icons in contents tab, as I'm enjoying the beautiful UI new icons since Dayman's 3.3.11 releases.
Thanks, Sledge and all involved!
First goodies I noticed were the Tags and the system file type specific icons in contents tab, as I'm enjoying the beautiful UI new icons since Dayman's 3.3.11 releases.
Thanks, Sledge and all involved!
Last edited by pesqb on Mon Aug 07, 2017 7:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: 3.4.0
[quote="Michel_Olski"]
I noticed that downloading a Big torrent (35GB) the 3.4 uses more then 600MB of RAM while uTorrent 2.2.1 (I guess you hate hearing that name) uses around 45MB. The difference is huge and that's with only one torrent added. On other machine I have a session with hundreds of them. I'm scared to even try upgrading it. On the other hand it seems to be quite stable. Not a single crash so far. It's also well translated which is always nice.
[/quote]
Well that must be file cache, not qBittorrent itself. Check your cache settings in both clients (IMO).
I noticed that downloading a Big torrent (35GB) the 3.4 uses more then 600MB of RAM while uTorrent 2.2.1 (I guess you hate hearing that name) uses around 45MB. The difference is huge and that's with only one torrent added. On other machine I have a session with hundreds of them. I'm scared to even try upgrading it. On the other hand it seems to be quite stable. Not a single crash so far. It's also well translated which is always nice.
[/quote]
Well that must be file cache, not qBittorrent itself. Check your cache settings in both clients (IMO).
Re: 3.4.0
Not saying it cannot happen, just thinking what might have caused it.
- Did you check stats when uTorrent already had the file (so 0 dl) and was only seeding.
- Did you have a fast download speed with qBittorrent (hence, high ram use.)
- Did you have had a specific ram cache setup, I use 1GB on my PC, so that may be the issue.
- uTorrent may report usage differently (since it uses win32 api), but it shows "reality" in the bottom stat page.
(And of course, thank you for helping out with testing.)
- Did you check stats when uTorrent already had the file (so 0 dl) and was only seeding.
- Did you have a fast download speed with qBittorrent (hence, high ram use.)
- Did you have had a specific ram cache setup, I use 1GB on my PC, so that may be the issue.
- uTorrent may report usage differently (since it uses win32 api), but it shows "reality" in the bottom stat page.
(And of course, thank you for helping out with testing.)
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 2444
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 1:17 pm
Re: 3.4.0
[quote="Michel_Olski"]
I noticed that downloading a Big torrent (35GB) the 3.4 uses more then 600MB of RAM while uTorrent 2.2.1 (I guess you hate hearing that name) uses around 45MB. The difference is huge and that's with only one torrent added. On other machine I have a session with hundreds of them. I'm scared to even try upgrading it. On the other hand it seems to be quite stable. Not a single crash so far. It's also well translated which is always nice.
[/quote]
I think there is a change on how libtorrent interprets "auto" for cache size between 1.0.x and 1.1.x versions. Go to advanced settings and set it to something really conservative, like 15MiB and see what happens.
I noticed that downloading a Big torrent (35GB) the 3.4 uses more then 600MB of RAM while uTorrent 2.2.1 (I guess you hate hearing that name) uses around 45MB. The difference is huge and that's with only one torrent added. On other machine I have a session with hundreds of them. I'm scared to even try upgrading it. On the other hand it seems to be quite stable. Not a single crash so far. It's also well translated which is always nice.
[/quote]
I think there is a change on how libtorrent interprets "auto" for cache size between 1.0.x and 1.1.x versions. Go to advanced settings and set it to something really conservative, like 15MiB and see what happens.
Re: 3.4.0
[quote="sledgehammer_999"]
[quote="Michel_Olski"]
I noticed that downloading a Big torrent (35GB) the 3.4 uses more then 600MB of RAM while uTorrent 2.2.1 (I guess you hate hearing that name) uses around 45MB. The difference is huge and that's with only one torrent added. On other machine I have a session with hundreds of them. I'm scared to even try upgrading it. On the other hand it seems to be quite stable. Not a single crash so far. It's also well translated which is always nice.
[/quote]
I think there is a change on how libtorrent interprets "auto" for cache size between 1.0.x and 1.1.x versions. Go to advanced settings and set it to something really conservative, like 15MiB and see what happens.
[/quote]
But the OS cache was enabled.
I thought that the "auto" setting works only when the OS cache is disabled and libtorrent handles that.
[quote="Michel_Olski"]
I noticed that downloading a Big torrent (35GB) the 3.4 uses more then 600MB of RAM while uTorrent 2.2.1 (I guess you hate hearing that name) uses around 45MB. The difference is huge and that's with only one torrent added. On other machine I have a session with hundreds of them. I'm scared to even try upgrading it. On the other hand it seems to be quite stable. Not a single crash so far. It's also well translated which is always nice.
[/quote]
I think there is a change on how libtorrent interprets "auto" for cache size between 1.0.x and 1.1.x versions. Go to advanced settings and set it to something really conservative, like 15MiB and see what happens.
[/quote]
But the OS cache was enabled.
I thought that the "auto" setting works only when the OS cache is disabled and libtorrent handles that.