Why such a pain to name folder?
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 9:52 pm
I have recently scanned the Internet for a decent torrent client since uTorrent became horrible. I have found that qBittorrent is to my liking in ALL ways but ONE.
Why have you made it such a pain to name the folder you're downloading? For example, if I download an album it is usually a bunch of music files stored in a folder. The name of the folder is almost always named in a way that does not go well with the sorting of my own music library. I realize that I can right-click the folder and rename it in qBittorent, and one can argue that it is not that it is not that much work. But it really is an unnecessary feature, that just makes things more difficult for the user. Especially if you're downloading plenty of folders, then it is really a pain to do this every time.
In the "Save As" menu, you should just have a field where you can type the path (with auto completion) and folder name. Just like uTorrent had before they destroyed it.
Why do you not want users to BOTH have sorted hard drives AND seed torrents?
Best regards,
DT
Why have you made it such a pain to name the folder you're downloading? For example, if I download an album it is usually a bunch of music files stored in a folder. The name of the folder is almost always named in a way that does not go well with the sorting of my own music library. I realize that I can right-click the folder and rename it in qBittorent, and one can argue that it is not that it is not that much work. But it really is an unnecessary feature, that just makes things more difficult for the user. Especially if you're downloading plenty of folders, then it is really a pain to do this every time.
In the "Save As" menu, you should just have a field where you can type the path (with auto completion) and folder name. Just like uTorrent had before they destroyed it.
Why do you not want users to BOTH have sorted hard drives AND seed torrents?
Best regards,
DT