Unofficial 64-bit installer/archive 3.3.x

[Nemo]

He will probably release his own version of x64 build but with v3.3.10 sledge released also a x64 build: https://www.fosshub.com/qBittorrent.html

I installed and using it at the moment, works good. Only a very small issue while installing: https://github.com/qbittorrent/qBittorrent/issues/6079, change that and it installs in the x64 directory.

[fusk]

Uhh.

[stihia]

I've noticed different sizes between the two releases of 3.3.10 x64 version, both on libtorrent 1.0.10. Gelmir (Dayman) release it's 16.1 MB, while sledgehammer_999's is 18.55 MB. What's the explanation?
Anyway, big thanks to both for the hard work !

[KitKat]

[quote="stihia"]
I've noticed different sizes between the two releases of 3.3.10 x64 version, both on libtorrent 1.0.10. Gelmir (Dayman) release it's 16.1 MB, while sledgehammer_999's is 18.55 MB. What's the explanation?
Anyway, big thanks to both for the hard work !
[/quote]

Probably executeable/Installer packing differences..
Dayman could have Mpress/UPX'd his installer sledgehammer may not have, or they use different installers to deliver the same thing and sledgehammer's takes up additional space.

[stihia]

Thank you, KitKat.
Another question: Gelmir releases that are using libtorrent 1.1 are safe now for daily use?
I am asking this because the 3.3.9 and 3.3.10 releases don't have the 3.3.7 mention: "Files marked with "libtorrent1.1." are not recommended for production; use at your own risk.".

[KitKat]

[quote="stihia"]
Thank you, KitKat.
Another question: Gelmir releases that are using libtorrent 1.1 are safe now for daily use?
I am asking this because the 3.3.9 and 3.3.10 releases don't have the 3.3.7 mention: "Files marked with "libtorrent1.1." are not recommended for production; use at your own risk.".
[/quote]

Gelmir builds from a direct fork of sledgehammer's master.
For all intents and purposes they are identical, if bugs exist in sledgehammers master regarding libtorrent1.1 they will exist in gelmir's version aswell.
Whether bugs exist, or how stable the libtorrent1.1 branch is i cant speak for as i've never personally used it.

This would be a question worth asking on the (probably both) github.

[sledgehammer_999]

Generally speaking, until the official build switches to 1.1.x proceed with a little caution. At least 1.1.2 should be used. It contains a shitload of changes. But I haven't tested actively with that branch so I cannot say if everything will work ok.
For example, I keep seeing increasing RAM usage during downloads while 1.0.x doesn't have this problem. I reached 200+MiB ram usage just by downloading 2 torrents while 1.0.x never breaks 100MiB(it is usually towards 80MiB).

[Pasha_ZZZ]

Very big delay from official 3.3.12 release... Older version were released same day

[Nemo]

[quote="Pasha_ZZZ"]
Very big delay from official 3.3.12 release... Older version were released same day
[/quote]

https://www.fosshub.com/qBittorrent.html

Both are there x32 & x64 official builds?

[Pasha_ZZZ]

[quote="Nemo"]Both are there x32 & x64 official builds?[/quote]I'm about Gelmir builds, this topic named "Unofficial", I think...

[Nemo]

It is.

But we got the official one now since few months.

[Pasha_ZZZ]

[quote="Nemo"]But we got the official one now since few months.[/quote] Official uses libtorrent 1.0, but Gelmir's - 1.1

[DENZEL519]

I would like to know in qBittorrent-3.3.13 libtorrent1.1 x64 whether a bug with WebUI will be fixed?

[Nemo]

Im not sure if 1.1 is stable enough to be used as a main version. Otherwise the ''official'' builds would use it too by now. I remember reading something about it at Github..

At Dayman's own release page it states:

Files marked with "libtorrent1.1." are not recommended for production; use at your own risk.

[DENZEL519]

It seems to be stable, so it connects faster with feasts and ciders, and the speed is higher and more stable.