Uh huh.
First of all you have to believe that the 'leaked' information about the "No Such Agency" monitoring capability is actually true or even remotely accurate, It wouldn't be the first instance of such "revelations" being total exaggeration 'leaked' by the agencies themselves to promote the level of paranoia in people who already believe the entire World is out to get them, just to see who jumps the highest in a bid to avoid being 'detected', and in doing so 'raise their head above the parapet'. Thus their guilty conscience exposes them far quicker than ANY kind of covert surveillance would do.
With all due respect, I suppose that the whole of the people who run the
Electronic Frontier Foundation and other related groups are part of the agencies' plan to exaggerate the mass surveillance issue? And
The Guardian, with all other supporting newspaper from over 50 countries, too, I suppose? Let's also not forget the leaders of a large number of countries who are possibly
pretending to be pi**ed? Who can forget the highly respected
Free Software Foundation? And what about the kingpin of it all, honorable Edward Snowden, who basically sacrified what could have been a fruitful, happy and peaceful life to expose the so called
mass surveillance?
Sorry for the outburst, but I had to say something!
I'd still like to see HTTPS support for the log in.
I merely gave the "No Such Agency" as just another reason to support such a feature. Adding that would increase security of one's account.
That's all. Period.
.
).