qBittorrent official forums

Dear all,
Here is a new qBittorrent 2.9.7 built with MSVC 2010 express :

Direct Link :
http://mkdib.free.fr/qbittorrent/qbitto ... _setup.exe

Libraries's version used:
libtorrent v0.15.11
Qt: 4.7.1
Boost: 1.46.0

I want your comments after testing it to be sure that this build does not suffer from I/O errors or memory leaks.
Once this build is validated by testers, I can mark the post OFFICIAL.

Waiting your comments;

Installed and testing, downloaded few things and seeding already without problems but will see how it works after few days usage .

No problems here Thanks, mkdib.

Seems to work fine. Dying for this to get uTP support though.

Thanks for the updated build. However I wonder why you don't update Qt to 4.8.0, Boost to 1.49 and Inno Setup to 5.4.3.

Also, you really have to commit the installer script to the git repository. Every person who compiles qBittorrent for Windows creates their own installer which leads to various problems like duplicate entries in the registry. Plus it will allow people to provide patches to improve the installer. I know I'd like to.

I totally agree with @Chem456. Here is my new Inno Setup Script https://rapidshare.com/files/2618867938/qbittorrent_iss.zip. It is "compatible" with @mkdib installer (I used the same "AppId" and clean up ).

Does it make a difference to use this one with the older boosts compared with your build with the newer boosts (and your build with 15.10 compared with this one 15.11)? Im not so into compiling and such and probably would answer/help others also .

In my opinion there is a difference. For example qBittorrent uses the Boost Filesystem library. We have a few changes and fixes between version 1.46 and 1.49.
Changelog: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_49_0/libs/filesystem/v3/doc/release_history.html
From what I remember also the Bind library is used ...
What I want to say is that the new libraries are almost always improved.

In fact Qt 4.8.1 is already available too. To summarize:

libtorrent: 0.15.11
Qt: 4.8.1
Boost: 1.49.0
OpenSSL: 0.9.8u or 1.0.1 (not sure if 1.0.1 is compatible with qBittorrent but if it is I see no reason to stay to 0.9.8u but make sure you compile it yourself since by default OpenSSL is compiled with /MD and the Windows builds out there are built with MSVC 2008 which means they require that runtime too. But if you build it yourself they will require the MSVC 2010 runtime dlls which are already included)
Inno Setup: 5.4.3

And don't forget to get your installer script in the git repository.

The last stable version of libtorrent is 0.15.10 and if I'm not mistaken next will be 0.16.0.
OpenSSL >= 1.0.0 supported (I think for qBittorrent ver. 2.9.7 needed)
The rest is 100% correct @Chem456.

Hello all,
10x for your reactivity.
It is a good idea  to put the installer script in the git repository. I will do it soon.

KR

hello all,
It is just for me or this version doesn't move the files by there label anymore?(the option is checked in downloads)

[quote="soul18reaver"]
hello all,
It is just for me or this version doesn't move the files by there label anymore?(the option is checked in downloads)
[/quote]
This is probably the explanation you're looking for:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qbittorrent/+bug/689201

[quote="Tomaso"]
[quote="soul18reaver"]
hello all,
It is just for me or this version doesn't move the files by there label anymore?(the option is checked in downloads)
[/quote]
This is probably the explanation you're looking for:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qbittorrent/+bug/689201
[/quote]
my mistake for not explaining the problem clear enough.
I was referring to the option in Downloads "append the label of the torrent to the save path", in 2.9.5 this option worked great saving the torrents in subfolders according to their label, but for 2.9.7 this doesn't work anymore. I wanted to know if this is occurring  just for me or i should submit it as a bug

[quote="soul18reaver"]my mistake for not explaining the problem clear enough.
I was referring to the option in Downloads "append the label of the torrent to the save path", in 2.9.5 this option worked great saving the torrents in subfolders according to their label, but for 2.9.7 this doesn't work anymore.
I wanted to know if this is occurring  just for me or i should submit it as a bug[/quote]

That's exactly what I thought you ment.
Your problem is directly related to the issue described at the link I posted.
It only affects magnet links, right?..
Like Dumez pointed out; magnet links are "missing important information (in particular, the torrent root folder name".
As you can see, a possible solution has been discussed.
It won't do any harm if you submit a new bug report specific to the "Append label" function though..